Skip to main content
ExpressionEngine® Answers

Return to Question

replaced http://meta.expressionengine.stackexchange.com/ with https://expressionengine.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

Note for Moderators: ExpressionEngine has a sister product called MojoMotor, which though much more lightweight, shares it's CodeIgniter DNA (and a very similar templating syntax) with EE, and allows migration to EE if you outgrow it - it could be considered a companion product - hence why I'm asking this question.

MojoMotor has a small but dedicated community, that I suspect broadly overlaps/is a subset of the EE community. Additionally many of the likely questions that relate to MM are similar in nature to those about EE. I therefore think it's worth asking should MojoMotor questions be off topic/out of scope for the EE StackExchange?

NB I think this is a different case to whether or not to allow pure HTML/CSS qnsallow pure HTML/CSS qns as there is much less value for the broader web-dev community in MM qns being answered on (say) SO, much more likelihood of them received a high quality answer here rather than elsewhere, and there are just not likely to be so darn many of them.

Note for Moderators: ExpressionEngine has a sister product called MojoMotor, which though much more lightweight, shares it's CodeIgniter DNA (and a very similar templating syntax) with EE, and allows migration to EE if you outgrow it - it could be considered a companion product - hence why I'm asking this question.

MojoMotor has a small but dedicated community, that I suspect broadly overlaps/is a subset of the EE community. Additionally many of the likely questions that relate to MM are similar in nature to those about EE. I therefore think it's worth asking should MojoMotor questions be off topic/out of scope for the EE StackExchange?

NB I think this is a different case to whether or not to allow pure HTML/CSS qns as there is much less value for the broader web-dev community in MM qns being answered on (say) SO, much more likelihood of them received a high quality answer here rather than elsewhere, and there are just not likely to be so darn many of them.

Note for Moderators: ExpressionEngine has a sister product called MojoMotor, which though much more lightweight, shares it's CodeIgniter DNA (and a very similar templating syntax) with EE, and allows migration to EE if you outgrow it - it could be considered a companion product - hence why I'm asking this question.

MojoMotor has a small but dedicated community, that I suspect broadly overlaps/is a subset of the EE community. Additionally many of the likely questions that relate to MM are similar in nature to those about EE. I therefore think it's worth asking should MojoMotor questions be off topic/out of scope for the EE StackExchange?

NB I think this is a different case to whether or not to allow pure HTML/CSS qns as there is much less value for the broader web-dev community in MM qns being answered on (say) SO, much more likelihood of them received a high quality answer here rather than elsewhere, and there are just not likely to be so darn many of them.

Source Link
Tom Davies
Tom Davies
  • 4.4k
  • 12
  • 10

Are MojoMotor questions on or off topic?

Note for Moderators: ExpressionEngine has a sister product called MojoMotor, which though much more lightweight, shares it's CodeIgniter DNA (and a very similar templating syntax) with EE, and allows migration to EE if you outgrow it - it could be considered a companion product - hence why I'm asking this question.

MojoMotor has a small but dedicated community, that I suspect broadly overlaps/is a subset of the EE community. Additionally many of the likely questions that relate to MM are similar in nature to those about EE. I therefore think it's worth asking should MojoMotor questions be off topic/out of scope for the EE StackExchange?

NB I think this is a different case to whether or not to allow pure HTML/CSS qns as there is much less value for the broader web-dev community in MM qns being answered on (say) SO, much more likelihood of them received a high quality answer here rather than elsewhere, and there are just not likely to be so darn many of them.